1928: Who would you have voted for? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:38:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1928: Who would you have voted for? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Herbert Hoover (R)
 
#2
Al Smith (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 106

Author Topic: 1928: Who would you have voted for?  (Read 12211 times)
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,069
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« on: May 26, 2020, 11:44:37 AM »

I think I would be a pretty damn big hack good party man at this time, so easy vote for Hoover.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,069
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2020, 04:52:01 PM »

Smith, but imagine how things would be different if Smith won. What would happen during the depression and WWII?

Hot take: the Great Depression and its end/World War II likely play out effectively the same no matter who is President, with the main differences just being how much each President intervenes in the economy but with all of them intervening.  (Remember, Hoover was VERY interventionist after 1929, actually.)
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,069
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2020, 09:28:00 PM »

Smith, but imagine how things would be different if Smith won. What would happen during the depression and WWII?

Hot take: the Great Depression and its end/World War II likely play out effectively the same no matter who is President, with the main differences just being how much each President intervenes in the economy but with all of them intervening.  (Remember, Hoover was VERY interventionist after 1929, actually.)


Um no , Smith would not have let the Bank of the United States fail which set of the major banking runs. Smith wouldnt have signed Smoot-Haley into law which was a disaster of a bill at a time when anything imports or exports was needed and Smith wouldnt have named Eugene Meyer to head the Fed who persued a tight money  policy

Bro, I like you as a poster, but give people the benefit of the doubt that they aren't simpletons when you respond to them, eh?  How can you read your response as critiquing anything I said?  I'm genuinely curious, haha.  I said the END of the Great Depression plays out the same, because what ended the Great Depression was World War II, and we join World War II under any POTUS.  I then said the only differences would be the degree to which each President would intervene into the economy, with each one intervening to a certain degree.

Do you not see it as odd how VAGUE my post was and how ridiculously specific your response was?  I don't care to discuss Taft-Hartley with you, haha, and that was not at all in any way the point of my post.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,069
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2020, 12:15:52 PM »

Al Smith (D).

In 1928, northern Blacks and Jews, both of which had been heavily Republican in 1920 and 1924, joined Catholics in voting for Al Smith.

The main difference between 1928 and 1984 is that, by 1984, most white Catholics had forgotten that they were minorities.

Err, where are you getting that data?  Monolithic GOP support from Black voters had actually evaporated by the 1890s from what I have seen in the past, but FDR in 1936 is generally accepted as the first Democrat to ever win a plurality ... Hoover even won them in 1932, and I highly doubt he lost them in 1928.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.