2014 US Congressional Election Results (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:10:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2014 US Congressional Election Results (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: 2014 US Congressional Election Results  (Read 192531 times)
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #50 on: December 06, 2014, 09:50:01 PM »

Apparently in the next few minutes.
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #51 on: December 06, 2014, 10:22:31 PM »

Caldwell is at 100% reporting and Cassidy wins 75-25. Landrieu is down 3 from November 4. So, if trends hold, 38% statewide.

The numbers are all over the place. In some parishes, it's Cassidy +3, others Landrieu +3 or 4. She may get to 42-44 when Orleans fully dumps.
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #52 on: December 06, 2014, 10:28:45 PM »

Caldwell is at 100% reporting and Cassidy wins 75-25. Landrieu is down 3 from November 4. So, if trends hold, 38% statewide.

Caldwell is on of the smallest (and most R) parishes in the state. Don't extrapolate that much from it.

Looks like the New Orleans-area parishes are in the +3 or +4 Landrieu range, so somewhere around 42-46 seems about right after the other 2/3 of Orleans Parish dumps.
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #53 on: December 06, 2014, 11:10:47 PM »

Republicans should be alarmed at this result.

Oh yeah, they ONLY beat a sitting Senator by 10-14 points. /sarcasm
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #54 on: December 06, 2014, 11:23:10 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2014, 11:27:21 PM by Recalcuate »

Republicans should be alarmed at this result.

Oh yeah, they ONLY beat a sitting Senator by 10-14 points. /sarcasm

Many of the AoS workers I was updating the election data with (I was the only Democrat) were disappointed at Cassidy's margin.

It's about where it should have been given Cassidy + Republican +Libertarian vote (~56%) and Landrieu + Democrat vote (~44%) in the jungle primary. Kind of inelastic in a way.
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444


« Reply #55 on: December 07, 2014, 12:15:34 AM »

There were about 180,000 fewer votes cast vs. the jungle primary. It seems like those that didn't show up to vote were split to their percentages in the general.

In the jungle primary, there were 813,352 votes (56.02%) cast for Republican or Libertarian candidates, while 638,658 (43.98%) were cast for Democrats.

In the runoff, 712,330 voted for Cassidy (55.94%) vs. 561,099 for Landrieu (44.06%). Extremely static.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.