Rate the Presidents, Installment #34: Dwight D. Eisenhower (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 07:15:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Rate the Presidents, Installment #34: Dwight D. Eisenhower (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you rate Dwight D. Eisenhower as a President?
#1
✯✯✯✯✯
 
#2
✯✯✯✯
 
#3
✯✯✯
 
#4
✯✯
 
#5
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Rate the Presidents, Installment #34: Dwight D. Eisenhower  (Read 1304 times)
ScottieF
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 349


« on: July 10, 2015, 01:20:10 PM »

Four stars. He's certainly a top ten president and I can think of few if any others who possessed such a remarkable understanding of the relationship between foreign and domestic policy. There is a link there in virtually everything he did. That being said he wasn't particularly "transformative" - more the best caretaker president we ever had - and some of his espionage shenanigans with the vile Dulles brothers detract him from the heights of greatness.
Logged
ScottieF
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 349


« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2015, 09:44:06 PM »

I figured Eisenhower would do very well. He tends to be the rare president (maybe the only modern president?) where almost no one on the ideological spectrum is going to give him one star by isolating one issue and taking a contrarian opinion. These polls tend to reward effective but mostly inconsequential presidents (e.g. Arthur, Monroe) but punishes consequential and therefore controversial presidents (e.g. Jackson, Wilson).
Logged
ScottieF
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 349


« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2015, 01:06:15 PM »

1 star. His economic policy was atrocious, and it nearly landed the country into another Depression; his foreign policy via the Eisenhower Doctrine planted the seeds for reactionary, anti-American sentiment in the Middle East--which we still see today in the form of Iran, Syria, and Iraq.  What is more, he even let Birchers like Ezra Taft Benson get sway in national politics.  A good man and a fabulous general, but an awful President.

What?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.