FT 3-03: Electoral Procedures Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 09:49:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  FT 3-03: Electoral Procedures Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FT 3-03: Electoral Procedures Act  (Read 816 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« on: July 10, 2017, 03:50:04 PM »

My thanks to the Speaker.

The purpose of this legislation, stated plainly enough in the description, is to formally establish in written law the rules by which our elections are conducted, counted, and decided. At present, many of the tasks addressed here are left entirely to the discretion of the elections administrator; and while this has not proved a problem as yet, in the event of a controversy it is always preferable to have the ability to reference the impartial and objective judgement of the law.

Sections 5, 6, and 7 are of particular importance, because - as almost became relevant last weekend - Fremont has no established procedure for the resolution of ties. This bill would correct that oversight by establishing the following series of "tiebreakers:"

(1) Greatest number of first preferences
(2) Greatest number of overall preferences (1s, 2s, etc.)
(3) Runoff
(4) Vote of Parliament

I realize electoral law is not the lightest or most interesting of topics, but I urge my colleagues to read this text thoroughly and completely. As those who lived through the nightmare of October 2016 will know, passing an ill-conceived elections law can have disastrous results, and I would hate to see my region suffer thus. I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2017, 05:18:27 PM »

Bump.

Does anyone besides Henry or me have an opinion of this? Because while I'm sure we would both be happy to serve as de facto co-dictators of Fremont, I'm not sure that's would be a good thing for the region in the long run. Tongue
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2017, 07:02:05 PM »

Right, I move for a final vote.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2017, 12:59:00 PM »

AYE
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2017, 12:18:36 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

While I'm happy the bill has passed, I will also register my disappointment that only one Member of Parliament apart from myself bothered to vote on this measure. I take full responsibility for my recent absence, which meant I was not around to remind people as I normally do; that said, the PM taking an unplanned leave of two days should not result in most of the parliament following suit, especially when keeping up with business is as simple as checking the links in the noticeboard every other day. My thanks to Henry for actually doing his job here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.