Fox - National: Clinton +3

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Good poll for Clinton, but man, dat education gap.  Clinton third place with non-college white males:

A lot of that is probably because Johnson probably has a lot of support of white men in college, who don't count as having a degree yet.  But, the more noteworthy gap has to be between men and women among whites with a degree!

[100% pro-life no matter what]

urban: Clinton +37
suburban: Clinton +9
rural: Trump +29

That can't be right, unless they're using an odd definition of rural. So Clinton is leading in urban areas by 37 (alright), in suburban areas by 9 (i'm skeptical, but we can go with it), and leads by 3 nationally? In a mostly urban country?

Maybe the MoE on that stuff is super high or something?

The urban sample is smaller than both the suburban and rural samples, judging by the subsample MoEs.  Though I guess it's not clear if it's still smaller than the other two after weighting, as that info isn't given.  But in terms of the raw number of people who responded to the poll, the "urban" sample is smaller than both suburban and rural.

When they say that we are mostly urban, their definition of urban is urban + suburban, I'm 99% sure.