More shady Clinton foundation stuff uncovered

[Ebsy]

Well, that should be embarrassing, but I wouldn't expect those afflicted with Hillary Derangement Syndrome to have any shame at their pathetic and paranoid ramblings.

[Ebsy]

LOL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/04/hillary-clintons-dismissal-of-clinton-cash-is-dead-206040.html

The fact that Schweizer's revelations have now been vetted and reported out by the likes of the Times, POLITICO, etc., means the Clinton campaign can no longer be so dismissive. And while Chait's column is probably not the definitive nail in that coffin -- "I think the stories themselves achieved that" -- it is certainly an added blow, if only because it is so damning in its assessment of what he dubs the "disastrous Clinton post-presidency."

This opinion piece is the most blatant case of circular reasoning I have ever seen.

[Ebsy]

I doubt they will ever find a quid pro quo, but there can be no doubt that big donors to Clinton Foundation had the ear of the SecState Clinton. It just feeds the narrative that she is an old school pol.

This is pretty lazy thinking.

I wonder when the media is going to report an all the good things done with the money the Clinton Foundation raised. I guess I won't hold by breath.

[Ebsy]

All part of the Clinton pattern of graft, corruption, and an entrenched attitude of entitlement, while at the same time having a belief that they are above the law.

This is simply the tip of the iceberg.

Yawn.

[Ebsy]

There's no evidence of corruption. Isn't all this scandal-mongering a bit tiring for you?

[Ebsy]

Gingrich said the Clinton Foundation broke the law.

I'm having to remind myself that it's not the 1990s again.

Well dont.  Because today unlike the 1990s the NYT and the WaPo are saying Hillary is corrupt. It isnt the vast right wing conspiracy going after Hillary but the Paper of Record.

You obviously didn't read any of the articles in the "Paper of Record."

[Ebsy]

Where in the article did it establish that Clinton had sold influence in the State Department?

I did actually and the editorial and the WaPo.
Your candidate is a train wreck and should she win, she will destroy the Dem party by 2018.

Also, stop concern trolling. The Democratic Party will be just fine.

[Ebsy]

You may think we didn't notice, but we all realize you didn't respond to my question asking where in the article you supposedly read that it established Clinton had peddled influence for donations in her family's charity.

[Ebsy]

You may think we didn't notice, but we all realize you didn't respond to my question asking where in the article you supposedly read that it established Clinton had peddled influence for donations in her family's charity.

Gee where is the evidence Bush knowingly lied about WMDs in Irag.

The answer is that is where the investigative reporting will lead. The Clinton Foundation will be a huge albotross for Hillary.

Still deflecting.

[Ebsy]

You're really unbelievable.

[Ebsy]

Actually, who was that luminary that said:

What the left doesnt get is that changing demographics dont change forever. The future cannot be predicted.

And yet here we have this upstart named bobloblaw, predicting that this story isn't going anywhere any time soon. bobloblaw ought to have a word with bobloblaw.