1940: Roosevelt/Truman vs. Taft/Vandenberg (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 04:18:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1940: Roosevelt/Truman vs. Taft/Vandenberg (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1940: Roosevelt/Truman vs. Taft/Vandenberg  (Read 797 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,911
United States



« on: April 17, 2015, 01:03:25 PM »
« edited: April 17, 2015, 01:05:17 PM by MohamedChalid »

Taft might be better able to rally conservatives but would lose moderates and indies. Truman wouldn't be picked in 1940 because he was still the Senator from Pendergast, an opinion which FDR and the Dem establishment shared. Plus he had an excruciating primary which he only won by a few thousand votes.

^^That's true. FDR had run with Wallace or Byrnes.

But Taft would have underperformed the charismatic and liberal Willkie.


Franklin D. Roosevelt/Henry Wallace: 481 EV. (57%)
Bob Taft/Arthur H. Vandenberg: 50 EV. (41%)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.