By the year 2100, Which Country Will be the World's Number 1 Superpower? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:35:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  By the year 2100, Which Country Will be the World's Number 1 Superpower? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which country do you think will be (or remain) the world's number 1 superpower by the end of this century?
#1
United States
 
#2
China
 
#3
India
 
#4
European Union
 
#5
other (please elaborate)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: By the year 2100, Which Country Will be the World's Number 1 Superpower?  (Read 2891 times)
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,844
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

« on: November 25, 2015, 01:18:12 AM »

The US is in a very good position for at least a couple of decades - almost certainly better than the EU and China, given the respective birthrates. India is a bit more of a wildcard, and could probably be a true superpower in a couple of decades, but I doubt they would be able to replace the US as #1.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,844
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2015, 02:37:09 PM »

I'm really surprised this pro-high birthrate propaganda has caught on so heavily.

You would think educated millennials in their 20s would be able to look at the Facebook profiles of their high school friends and immediately tell that having kids does not equal economic success.

Of course it doesn't, and too high of birth rates can be terrible for a country, especially if it comes from a lack of access to healthcare and family planning. But having a fertility rate of 2.01 (US) is at least marginally better than having one of 1.60 (EU) in order to not have an aging population, and to be able to pay for the social programs that keep countries healthy with a high workforce:retired ratio.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.