Why are Clinton's other numbers so good if it's an outlier?
The Bush-Gore numbers included tons of Nader voters who switched to Gore at the end of the election cycle. That's not an issue here. Even if Clinton won all the undecided, he still would only be on par with Gore.
No, skybridge, you're a partisan hack. It's every Democratic map in this thread that is ridiculous, and shows how delusional the average poster on this board is.
Clinton had higher approval ratings when he left office than Reagan. So why would the voters have decided for change even more overwhelmingly than they actually did in 2000 for someone considered one of the least experienced candidates ever?
Poll
