Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 06:57:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)  (Read 44089 times)
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« on: March 01, 2016, 08:11:50 PM »

Exit poll toplines if my math is right:

OK:
Sanders 51%
Clinton 47%

MA:
Sanders 52%
Clinton 46%


Wow, I was not expecting him to win Massachusetts.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2016, 09:45:49 PM »

Yeah, Clinton is essentially 20,000 ahead in MA already. Why isn't this being called?

A lot of places haven't come in yet. This could still be another Iowa.

Anyway, what surprises me is that Holyoke is basically tied between Clinton and Sanders (with Clinton having a slight edge). I would have expected that to be a bigger Clinton win. Meanwhile, Berkshire County seems a lot more divided than I'd expect; I'd expect it to go heavily for Sanders.

Also, it looks like that poll putting Sanders ahead in Worcester County might have been correct. This map isn't looking anything like what I expected.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2016, 10:13:57 PM »

We need to dispel with this fiction that the media doesn't know what they're doing by not calling MA. They know exactly what they're doing. Things look good for Clinton, and I think she'll most likely win but the map isn't like anything I've ever seen, so I can see why they're being careful here.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2016, 10:26:05 PM »

We need to dispel with this fiction that the media doesn't know what they're doing by not calling MA. They know exactly what they're doing. Things look good for Clinton, and I think she'll most likely win but the map isn't like anything I've ever seen, so I can see why they're being careful here.

And they're doing something a little more scientific than "George, have you seen this map before? Who won that time?"

Well yeah, but my point is the demographics of this race aren't like any previous race, which makes it hard to call when it's relatively close.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.