Rethinking McGovern (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:46:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Rethinking McGovern (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does George McGovern's 1972 presidential campaign deserve a positive reevaluation?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I/O)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Rethinking McGovern  (Read 496 times)
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

« on: April 24, 2009, 01:08:32 PM »

Discuss.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2009, 01:28:38 PM »

He got crushed. You can't get crushed and have run a good campaign. No, there is nothing to say: McGovern was an awful candidate who ran an awful campaign.

McGovern's primary campaign was brilliant, and imo is more relevant to today's situation than the bungled conduct of the general is. The coalition he put together to beat Humphrey, Muskie, et al was strikingly modern. In many ways, it's reminiscent of the coalition that chose Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton.

Really, he was a 21st century Democratic candidate stuck running with the Democratic Party of, well, 1972. His real problem was that he ran about 35 years too soon- just like Barry Goldwater. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.