Why not Fusion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 09:32:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why not Fusion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support 'fusion'?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
it is not an important issue
 
#4
undecided
 
#5
all other answers
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Why not Fusion?  (Read 3597 times)
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


« on: May 15, 2007, 02:18:09 PM »

Don't understand it from the article given to me.

It's pretty sweet as a music genre though Smiley
Logged
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007, 12:50:35 AM »

Don't understand it from the article given to me.

Basically, you have third parties on the ballot that often endorse people running for the main parties too.  For example, for President Bush, he was a candidate for both the NY Republican Party and the NY Conservative Party.  If for some reason, he did something to piss off the Conservative Party, they could endorse someone else, which could end up costing him votes in the state. 

It might seem silly, but there are a lot of voters who are members of one of our 3rd parties that take it very seriously and vote straight party line.  It gives those 3rd parties a lot of pull in close races, where if the Republican candidate doesn't get the endorsement of the Conservatives or maybe the Independence Party, it could cost him the election.

Thanks for clarifying.  Looks like I'll also agree with:

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.