1)
Quite frankly, our security is our biggest risk. I proposed the Northeast Guard just days before the terrorist attacks. I will not call it foresight, but I took a strong stance on regional defense before the terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, RGN said:
We should amend this bill. We should ask consent from the Senate, with the recommending approval of this assembly (should this bill pass)
However, he then proceeded to vote for the bill. I know that I expected politicians to flip flop easily, but on what was a VERY controversial bill, RGN seemed to change his stance once he thought people were afraid. SWE hasn't even taken a stance for or against this bill. While I respect my opponents and their long time in Atlasia, I cannot honestly say that they have spoken about this enough in my opinion.
2)
I would appoint NHI to one of the two offices, and then ask Poirot or Winfield to step into the Assembly and take up the other job. I consider all three of them very diligent and intelligent. Poirot was my predecessor as Speaker and frankly quite good at it. Winfield has a very long history in office, serving the Northeast. NHI is a moderate Federalist, and I consider his detail in story writing admirable. I think he might be able to transfer that over to writing legislation.
3)
a) SomebodyWhoExists: He is a very principled fighter. I consider him to be a formidable foe, as what he fights for he does not surrender, even if he does lose. However, he is controversial for being on trial for treason.
b) RGN: I consider his experience a good thing for the Assembly and it's votes, especially. Finally, RGN tends to be very simple, as he does not have an announcement speech or detailed policy plans. He's always been that way, as far as I can see, and I don't see him changing.