Bacon King v. SOFE

[Kingpoleon]

Greetings, honorable Justices. I have decided to testify because I am the person commented about in two votes declared invalid. I am not insulted. I am not maligned. I merely have been commented about. If commenting is campaigning, I haven't gone a day of my life without campaigning. If commenting is campaigning, anyone and everyone campaigns.

However, if this definition seems as deceptive and purposely misguided to you as it does to me, then there is but one result. Campaigning is working in an organized, structured, and active way with a particular goal in mind. What organization and structure is there in these comments? What particular goal do they have in mind? In what way is it more active than normally voting?

[Kingpoleon]

With all due respect I have to Mr BaconKing and Mr Kingpoleon, I fail to understand how having Kingpoleon as a witness is necessary.

The defendant claims that the votes of BRTD and Hashemite are invalid for campaigning against Kingpoleon - is it not relevant that Kingpoleon himself, as the alleged victim, doesn't even consider their personal ballot statements to have been an attempt to campaign against him?

In my view it is not in this case, as Mr Kingpoleon has a fairly good interest of not having this ballot invalidated, but I just speak for myself.

My interest in having these be valid is far less than rpryor's interest in the election. However, he held an election.

Furthermore, I have a possible counterbalancing interest against them, if they have actively campaigned against me. If not, then I believe my questions ought to be answered: ideally in a way that's not talking in circles.