I would hire someone economically successful to be a economic secretary if I were POTUS. I don't see the problem.
Because "have wealthy and well-connected parents, go to Ivy League schools, then work on Wall Street" isn't readily transferable to an $18 trillion dollar economy of 325 million people.
It is amazing that one can realize this and not reject socialism and central planning on a more general basis.
What's even more amazing if some people still conflate opposing further tax cuts for the top 1% with socialism, let alone Central planning.
I apologize for reaching to conclusions and assuming that someone supporting a candidate who was a self-declared socialist was at least sympathetic to the ideology.