Mr. Illini's Chicagoland Township Map Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 04:29:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Mr. Illini's Chicagoland Township Map Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Mr. Illini's Chicagoland Township Map Thread  (Read 10519 times)
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« on: November 04, 2015, 04:36:43 PM »

Great work!  I really enjoy these maps
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2015, 11:41:49 PM »
« Edited: November 05, 2015, 12:53:20 AM by Green Line »

Thanks, Green Line!

I've merged my city-by-ward and suburb-by-township maps for a full map of Cook County.

Such a beautifully Democratic county. Outliers are Barrington in the NW - a rural wealthy suburb. Lemont and Orland in the SW - rural and white working class.

Other than that a whole lot of Democratic red. Biggest change since the 80s is in the northern portions. Skokie, Evanston, New Trier, Northfield, Wheeling, Schaumburg, etc would have been mostly to solid GOP 30 years ago - now solid Dem.



Beauty is subjective!  Also rural may qualify for Lemont but Orland is definitely not rural or working class in any sense.  It's a pretty typical Cook County suburb, just slightly less dense than Schaumburg and middle to upper middle class

It really is amazing how well Obama ran in places like Palatine and Palos in 2008
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2015, 01:29:17 AM »
« Edited: November 05, 2015, 01:34:57 AM by Green Line »

Lemont is CERTAINLY the least dense of the townships presented @muon

See here, although the map is old, it has not seen rapid population: http://130.166.124.2/chiatlas/chi149.GIF

Orland perhaps less so. Barrington actually moreso, which differentiates it from New Trier - both have incredible wealth but NT (60% Obama) is dense, Barrington (50% McCain) is less so

Lemont has actually seen pretty decent growth.  7,348 people in 1990 (the date of your map) to 16,661 in 2014.  Most of Lemont township is just uninhabited forest preserves, but the actual town of Lemont where everyone lives is much smaller and denser, just 8 sq miles.  Not that anyone cares, but there is my geography lesson on southwest cook county!
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2015, 01:48:25 AM »

Its population is only 21k. The only townships smaller are Barrington + others that are significantly smaller in land area and closer to the city.

Ok, you called it rural, that's what I was responding to.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2015, 01:57:44 AM »


Yes, im aware... That map shows nothing which proves your point. What am I supposed to be seeing
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2015, 03:53:14 PM »
« Edited: November 06, 2015, 04:01:50 PM by Green Line »

2014 Gubernatorial as well

Notice all of those north suburban townships that went for Obama twice went for Rauner. Also notice a ward in the city going for Rauner.

In the city, Quinn was largely able to hold Obama's numbers among African Americans. The Hispanic and white areas are where we saw sharp R swings.


Is that purple spot a tie?

Quinn held up well with whites on the southwest side too. Worth township should have fell before most of those northern suburbs going off Obama's numbers

Although that probably says more about Obama than it does Quinn
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2015, 04:13:00 PM »

2014 Gubernatorial as well

Notice all of those north suburban townships that went for Obama twice went for Rauner. Also notice a ward in the city going for Rauner.

In the city, Quinn was largely able to hold Obama's numbers among African Americans. The Hispanic and white areas are where we saw sharp R swings.


Is that purple spot a tie?

Quinn held up well with whites on the southwest side too. Worth township should have fell before most of those northern suburbs going off Obama's numbers

Although that probably says more about Obama than it does Quinn

My initial inkling is that that is a very historically Irish area, which would obviously aid Quinn.

Also worth noting that Rauner was a better fit for the northern suburbs.

Yeah its socially conservative and heavily union, the worst fit for Rauner
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2015, 02:50:33 PM »
« Edited: November 09, 2015, 02:53:07 PM by Green Line »

Can you make the same maps with Kirk numbers from 2010?  It would be interesting to compare the Kirk and Rauner vote.  The margins in Cook County were almost the same but I wonder how different their coalitions were.

Edit: I glanced at the numbers real quick and it looks like Kirk won Worth Township in 2010 despite getting 2% lower than Rauner
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2015, 02:38:58 PM »


Rauner did pretty well with Hispanics for a Republican, but it was mostly due to the white areas of Aurora having way higher turnout. 
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2015, 02:42:38 PM »

For the Democratic primary in Cook, I'm expecting Clinton to win by a lot (possibly up to 20 points). Still, the well off liberal white areas will vote for Bernie, like Evanston. The only places I see Bernie having a chance in area University hubs like Champaign-Urbana and (maybe) northwest Illinois (I'm guessing Bernie will do well in Eastern Iowa)

I anticipate moderate Clinton margins in NW and SW Cook (Palatine, Barrington, Schaumburg, etc; Orland, Lemont, etc), Sanders victories in super white liberal areas (Evanston, Skokie, Park Ridge, Oak Park, LaGrange, Chicago Northside, etc), large Clinton margins in Hispanic and black areas (Cicero, Berwyn, Chicago Southside, Chicago Westside, Rich, Bloom, etc).

Probably something like 60-30 Clinton.

Park Ridge is not particularly Liberal, it votes Republican more often than not.  Aside from that, Hillary is from Park Ridge and went to Maine South for High School.  I think she'll win big in that area.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2015, 11:32:26 AM »
« Edited: December 21, 2015, 11:35:44 AM by Green Line »


Rauner did pretty well with Hispanics for a Republican, but it was mostly due to the white areas of Aurora having way higher turnout.  

How would white turnout improve his numbers with Hispanics?  Are you comparing white Hispanics to the non-white ones?

I was saying Rauner won Aurora because the electorate was significantly whiter than the actual population.  I wasn't trying to equate white turnout with his Hispanic numbers.  Sorry for the confusion
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2016, 11:17:53 PM »
« Edited: May 24, 2016, 11:22:33 PM by Green Line »

My favorite map so far!  Did Moore come ahead of Alvarez in any of the North side Wards/townships?

And how the heck did criminal Dorothy Brown win her primary? Any chance you could do a map of that?
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2016, 12:27:38 AM »

Looks like Anita won Mexicans and lost Puerto Ricans. Sad! Crime in Cook County will continue to skyrocket no doubt.
Logged
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« Reply #13 on: May 25, 2016, 12:41:12 AM »
« Edited: May 25, 2016, 12:45:32 AM by Green Line »

I'll have to do a map of the Brown race. Crazy stuff - Cook Co Dems fully rescinded their endorsement - should have been a death knell.

Somehow, she persevered. Gotta love Chicago politics! Always keeps you guessing.

Did your township/ward (can't remember if you're in the city or not) go Alvarez or Foxx?
Gotta love it... Unless you live here!

My home went for Alvarez strongly, but the ward where I live now was won by Foxx.
An election like this makes me wish Cook County had a top 2 jungle primary, because I think Alvarez would have had a decent shot at beating Foxx when you include Republican and Independent votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 10 queries.