Was the intervention in Libya a.... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 04:20:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Was the intervention in Libya a.... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Was the intervention in Libya a....
#1
"smart power at its best" Hillary
 
#2
"sh**t show" Obama
 
#3
some third thing (Hillary apologists)
 
#4
some third thing (other)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: Was the intervention in Libya a....  (Read 1227 times)
Green Line
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,602
United States


« on: October 05, 2016, 06:04:38 PM »

It was a mess.  When we act we need to go all in or not act at all, no half measures designed to placate the public. If we were going to get involved in Libya it should have been with massive firepower and troops. We should have gone in and ensured that the government being set up in the aftermath was exactly the government that we wanted and that it would work for us.  Not just drop a few bombs, scatter the army, and leave the rebels to pick up the pieces.

It was a similar situation to Iraq.  We cheaped out in the Iraq War because Rumsfeld wanted the invasion to be as cheap and undisruptive to the public as possible.  We should have gone in with <600,000 troops, enough to actually occupy the entire country and clean up any dissenters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.