The politics of mining and resource extraction (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 03:55:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  The politics of mining and resource extraction (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The politics of mining and resource extraction  (Read 1868 times)
Craziaskowboi
Rookie
**
Posts: 38


« on: February 12, 2016, 03:49:50 PM »

I read in another topic that "corn is more Democrat than wheat, and wheat is more Democrat than cattle." What I'm curious to know is, where would mining and resource extraction fall on this spectrum? I'm thinking it'd be over to the right with the cattle, because most hard-core environmentalists tend to be Democrats, and people who work in mining and resource extraction see the Democrat environmental platform as a threat to their livelihood. Correct me if I'm wrong, though.
Logged
Craziaskowboi
Rookie
**
Posts: 38


« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 04:00:41 PM »

It should be noted that many of the energy states mentioned have very small populations, Wyoming, North Dakota, West Virginia, Alaska.  Oklahoma and Louisiana are somewhat larger though they've both lost congressional districts over the last decades.  The smallness of states does effect coal as they're very dependent on populated states to use a product that tends to be very unpopular outside of coal mining regions and has competitive alternatives.  Hence Montana sending a delegation to Washington state begging them not to shutdown their portion of the Coalstrip power plant.

Texas of course is the exception. It's the biggest producer of oil and gas (by far).   It's also where the corporate jobs are and always consolidate to in hard times (much to the chagrin of Louisiana and Oklahoma). 

Nobody mention Pennsylvania which is of course the number two producer of Natural Gas.  Couldn't have eviscerated Appalachian coal without it.

As far as environmentally friendly competitors for fossil fuel, can anyone name the state that produces the most wind energy (by far)?  They actually burned 40% less coal last month than they did in the same month in 2014. 

With all the coal and natural gas in western Pennsylvania, it's no wonder there's been such a dramatic shift toward the Republicans there. If you overlay a map of Pennsylvania's coal and gas fields onto a map of the Commonwealth's recent political trends at the county level, there's almost a perfect correlation between the presence of hydrocarbons underground and a shift toward the Republicans.

Not that it was ever very credible in the first place, but James Carville's assessment of Pennsylvania politics is finally about to be discarded in favor of a new paradigm, illustrating an increasingly Democrat eastern half, and an increasingly Republican western half, with Allegheny County becoming an increasingly East Coast-style Democrat exclave (I have less than 20 posts so I can't post the necessary links to illustrate this trend), and Erie County remaining part of the Great Lakes Democrat belt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.