Depends on what you mean by "SJW". Usually when I see the term it's referring to kids on tumblr who use terms like "cultural appropriation" and use custom pronouns. Such a person may eventually stand in 2032 at the earliest and they would lose for advocating legislated morality (under relatively neutral economic conditions).
A more broad definition of SJW may include Bernie Sanders, who claimed that the USA was originally founded on racist principles. See
https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/ .
Problem is, a lot of SJWs in the first category oppose him for some reason. Frankly I think it's just because he's running against the potential first female president, not because of his stances on the issues. This is despite the fact that Hillary Clinton is a neoliberal centrist who is known to change her stances on the issues often. It makes sense that some democrats might support Clinton over Sanders because they might be more centrist, but when SJWs do the same their motive and arguments always feel more tribal.
Social Justice Warriors wanted a woman to replace Andrew Jackson on the 20.
The Obama administration announced that a woman will be on the 10.
They're out SJWing the SJWs.
Oh it's just so great that they're removing one of the founding fathers who made this country possible instead of a man of slaughtered native americans and opposed central banks in the first place.
