Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:46:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: More bitter/tougher defeat?
#1
Al Gore		  
#2
Hillary Clinton		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 122

Author Topic: Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016  (Read 4946 times)
Drew
drewmike87
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 997
United States



« on: December 31, 2016, 08:13:57 PM »
IMO, Hillary's loss was tougher for a few reasons.  I was in Jr. High in 2000 and wasn't nearly as politically aware as I am today.  Also, the 2000 election resulted in a divided congress, vs. an ultra-GOP congress and open SCOTUS seat in 2016.  And finally, it's true that Bush did a bunch of stuff that I disagreed with.  But I unfortunately imagine Trump will as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.