Adolf Hitler and a gorilla are drowning in a river. You can only save 1.

[This account no longer in use.]

Seriously though, SWE (provided he's not trolling) is absolutely correct.

Unless we're talking about Hitler when he's in power and can still do damage (in which case the moral question is a completely different ones that has nothing to to with gorillas), then saving the human being is the only morally acceptable course of action.

Gorillas are an endangered species

Hitler killed 11 million people

And you save him? That isn't morally acceptable.

What's not morally acceptable is to care more for an "endangered species" than for a fellow human being.

Even when that human is literally Hitler?

[This account no longer in use.]

If Hitler was Hitler today, and Hitler cloning machine. You hold world hostage with Hitler Clone Hitler Unlimited Hitler. What hold hostage with exchange for Hitler Hitler?

[This account no longer in use.]

Which one is the fiscal conservative and which one is the social conservative? That will play a role.

Western Hitler is more fiscally conservative, while eastern Hitler is more socially conservative.

[This account no longer in use.]

Which one is the fiscal conservative and which one is the social conservative? That will play a role.

Western Hitler is more fiscally conservative, while eastern Hitler is more socially conservative.

and the gorilla is SOCIAL LIBERAL, FISCLA CONSREVERVTVE!!!!

Like me lol

[This account no longer in use.]

You know, Tony, maybe AAD is right about you.