Panetta Lifts Ban on Women Serving in Combat. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 04:01:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Panetta Lifts Ban on Women Serving in Combat. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Panetta Lifts Ban on Women Serving in Combat.  (Read 6627 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« on: January 25, 2013, 07:20:05 PM »

A broad majority of Americans support letting women serve in combat roles.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2013, 10:19:35 PM »

I support this 100%. As much as I dislike the idea of conscription, I also support women having to register for the draft at 18 as long as men do too. Fair is fair.

Naturally, I fully expect that will happen as a matter of course.  It wouldn't make sense otherwise, now that combat roles have been opened to women.  
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2013, 01:38:35 AM »

I support this 100%. As much as I dislike the idea of conscription, I also support women having to register for the draft at 18 as long as men do too. Fair is fair.

Naturally, I fully expect that will happen as a matter of course.  It wouldn't make sense otherwise, now that combat roles have been opened to women.  
Short of an enormous emergency on the scale of WWII, I fully do not expect that to happen. It's a double standard. You win some. You lose some. Women would be outraged. Why would a politician propose such a thing? Laws don't have to make sense.

You're not making any sense to me.  We are talking about the Selective Service, are we not?  Where's the controversy? 
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2013, 01:47:09 AM »


That's not the first image I was thinking of:

Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2013, 10:05:00 AM »

I support this 100%. As much as I dislike the idea of conscription, I also support women having to register for the draft at 18 as long as men do too. Fair is fair.

Naturally, I fully expect that will happen as a matter of course.  It wouldn't make sense otherwise, now that combat roles have been opened to women.  
Short of an enormous emergency on the scale of WWII, I fully do not expect that to happen. It's a double standard. You win some. You lose some. Women would be outraged. Why would a politician propose such a thing? Laws don't have to make sense.

You're not making any sense to me.  We are talking about the Selective Service, are we not?  Where's the controversy? 
Ask a dozen women how they would feel about having to sign up. I think you'll find a great deal of controversy.

Evidence?  And I don't just mean Naso-like anecdotes -do you have any polls to back that up with? 
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2013, 08:06:40 PM »

I wonder how the Israeli military handles this. 
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,742
United States


WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2013, 08:22:28 PM »

I wonder how the Israeli military handles this. 

Answered my own question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.