Not a U.S. citizen, so I won't vote. But, for the record, I'd vote for Clinton.
Clinton is a former First Lady who never really got anything right on major issues as Secretary of State. At least Trump has achieved things in business and knows how to run companies. Why would anyone prefer a failed politician with no charisma like Clinton over Trump? Obama has no clue how to run a business. Obama and Clinton could not run a lemonade stand.
Is this seriously your argument for Trump?How disappointing.
Clinton is also a former 2-term senator and a former Secretary of State, and she did get quite a number of things right and some others wrong, but nobody is perfect.
Trump has achieved few things in business that didn't fail, and the government should never be treated as either a business or a company; it's a government.
Clinton is not a failed politician, and Trump has no business in the Oval Office. He has zero experience with any kind of policy, is thin-skinned, with evident narcissistic tendencies, and a bold-faced liar/flip-flopper. He also has no respect for anyone, including his constituents, and his own supporters admit he probably shouldn't be handed nuclear codes. Your candidate is a joke and cannot hold a candle to Clinton or Sanders or Kasich, etc. If it weren't for his enormous inherited wealth and the "small loan" of a million dollars, he'd be nothing.