Grassley and Feinsten "grim and rattled" after meeting with Comey

[Dr. Arch]

Somebody with whom I had dinner a few days ago, who claims he is in the know (he's tight with our local congressperson, Schumer, and on and on), says the evidence will show (Flynn will be given immunity to squeal) that Trump offered Russia a relaxing of sanctions, in exchange for Russia's intervention in the campaign - in other words treason as it were. Thus the Pub rush to get some stuff through before Trump is neutralized. My source is busy trying to get dough for the Hudson Valley from the proposed Trump money dump into infrastructure. Money always gets these kinds of folks agitated. Who knew?

Makes sense. The Dems have been pushing this 'Trump collaborated with the Russians to cheat the election' for months, with allies of theirs within the establishment media and within various three letter agencies doing the legwork in coming up with various bits of 'evidence'. The fact that these pieces of 'evidence' don't stand up to much scrutiny doesn't seem to matter much to those who are emotionally invested in hating Trump. They're clearly willing to suspend disbelief and be convinced by this 'evidence'.

It makes sense that the Dems and their allies have planned the release of some kind of 'money shot' evidence designed to be a 'killer blow' for Trump. Whether this 'evidence' stands up and better to scrutiny than the previous 'evidence' we shall see.

How's that Obama wiretap evidence going for ya?

[Dr. Arch]

Somebody with whom I had dinner a few days ago, who claims he is in the know (he's tight with our local congressperson, Schumer, and on and on), says the evidence will show (Flynn will be given immunity to squeal) that Trump offered Russia a relaxing of sanctions, in exchange for Russia's intervention in the campaign - in other words treason as it were. Thus the Pub rush to get some stuff through before Trump is neutralized. My source is busy trying to get dough for the Hudson Valley from the proposed Trump money dump into infrastructure. Money always gets these kinds of folks agitated. Who knew?

Makes sense. The Dems have been pushing this 'Trump collaborated with the Russians to cheat the election' for months, with allies of theirs within the establishment media and within various three letter agencies doing the legwork in coming up with various bits of 'evidence'. The fact that these pieces of 'evidence' don't stand up to much scrutiny doesn't seem to matter much to those who are emotionally invested in hating Trump. They're clearly willing to suspend disbelief and be convinced by this 'evidence'.

It makes sense that the Dems and their allies have planned the release of some kind of 'money shot' evidence designed to be a 'killer blow' for Trump. Whether this 'evidence' stands up and better to scrutiny than the previous 'evidence' we shall see.

How's that Obama wiretap evidence going for ya?

Going great. Various media outlets and three letter org bigwigs have been furiously denying that Trump was under surveillance after months of various media outlets propagandising against him by insinuating that he was, thereby rather dramatically undermining their insinuations.

Your response does not answer my question. Try again.

[Dr. Arch]

Somebody with whom I had dinner a few days ago, who claims he is in the know (he's tight with our local congressperson, Schumer, and on and on), says the evidence will show (Flynn will be given immunity to squeal) that Trump offered Russia a relaxing of sanctions, in exchange for Russia's intervention in the campaign - in other words treason as it were. Thus the Pub rush to get some stuff through before Trump is neutralized. My source is busy trying to get dough for the Hudson Valley from the proposed Trump money dump into infrastructure. Money always gets these kinds of folks agitated. Who knew?

Makes sense. The Dems have been pushing this 'Trump collaborated with the Russians to cheat the election' for months, with allies of theirs within the establishment media and within various three letter agencies doing the legwork in coming up with various bits of 'evidence'. The fact that these pieces of 'evidence' don't stand up to much scrutiny doesn't seem to matter much to those who are emotionally invested in hating Trump. They're clearly willing to suspend disbelief and be convinced by this 'evidence'.

It makes sense that the Dems and their allies have planned the release of some kind of 'money shot' evidence designed to be a 'killer blow' for Trump. Whether this 'evidence' stands up and better to scrutiny than the previous 'evidence' we shall see.

How's that Obama wiretap evidence going for ya?

Going great. Various media outlets and three letter org bigwigs have been furiously denying that Trump was under surveillance after months of various media outlets propagandising against him by insinuating that he was, thereby rather dramatically undermining their insinuations.

Your response does not answer my question. Try again.

If you're not satisfied with my response here then that's not my problem.

lol, if students did this when they submitted an essay that goes on tangents, they'd get Fs. Suit yourself.