Inaccurate thread title. Late term abortion was already basically outlawed there, as it is in most and possibly all states. The bill kept the exception to the ban if a mother's life is at risk or to prevent irreversible physical impairment of a mother's major bodily function. All this bill did was remove the vague indefinable exception of allowing it because of psychological harm to the mother and add to the 24-week standard a standard of that the doctor has to determine that the child would not be viable if taken from the womb intact.
Really, the only reason I can see to oppose the bill is not if you are pro-choice, but because you are pro-abortion.
I'm pro-choice and I would oppose this on the grounds that psychological risk should be legal grounds for termination.
