ND-SEN: But you are, Blanche, you are (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 09:09:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  ND-SEN: But you are, Blanche, you are (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ND-SEN: But you are, Blanche, you are  (Read 110315 times)
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« on: September 21, 2018, 06:12:35 PM »

North Dakota GOP Senate nominee Kevin Cramer said on Friday that the accusation against Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh was "even more absurd" than Anita Hill's accusation against Clarence Thomas because Kavanaugh and his accuser were drunk teenagers when the alleged incident occurred.

Cramer added that Ford's allegations were less legitimate than Hill's in part because the assault she describes "never went anywhere."

Cramer, who currently represents North Dakota as a congressman, was comparing Hill's 1991 allegations of workplace sexual harassment against the later-confirmed Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas to California professor Christine Blasey Ford's current allegation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh.

"If to the degree there was any legitimacy to Anita Hill's claims, and she tried and didn't prevail -- Clarence Thomas did and America did -- this case is even more absurd because these people were teenagers when this supposed alleged incident took place," Cramer said on the Jarrod Thomas Show on 1310 KNOX, a local North Dakota radio station. "Teenagers. Not a boss-supervisor-subordinate situation, as the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill situation was claimed to be. These are teenagers who evidently were drunk, according to her own statement. They were drunk. Nothing evidently happened in it all, even by her own accusation. Again, it was supposedly an attempt or something that never went anywhere."
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2018, 09:06:30 PM »

Cramer apparently doesn't think that attempted rape is a crime because there was no penetration.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2018, 10:07:03 PM »

How long until this rape gaffe ends up in an ad?
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2018, 12:13:39 AM »

wow, I hope this gets some traction... Go, Heidi!

Heitkamp needs to hammer this home
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2018, 08:31:07 AM »

If someone is working on Heitkamp's campaign, please make an ad like this:

_____________________________________________________________

Female voice:

Kevin Cramer don't think that attempted rape is a crime because "they were drunk and nothing evidently happened".

Tell Kevin Cramer that attempted rape is rape.

_____________________________________________________________

Just hammer those two lines for the rest of the election.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2018, 08:50:57 AM »


It doesn't need to.

Just moving the needle slightly can make a huge difference.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2018, 06:18:37 PM »

If someone is working on Heitkamp's campaign, please make an ad like this:

_____________________________________________________________

Female voice:

Kevin Cramer don't think that attempted rape is a crime because "they were drunk and nothing evidently happened".

Tell Kevin Cramer that attempted rape is rape.

_____________________________________________________________

Just hammer those two lines for the rest of the election.

Yeah I wouldn't even reference this specifically in regards to Kavanaug, but issues of sexual assault in general.
If she votes YEA on Kavanaugh, though, she loses the moral ground to attack Cramer on this issue.


Exactly, which is why she has to vote NO.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2018, 12:43:35 AM »

I am hoping for a new poll to see how the race has shifted since Cramer's gaffe.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2018, 11:46:53 AM »

Cramer questions whether Kavanaugh assault allegation is disqualifying — even if true

Rep. Kevin Cramer, the Republican nominee for Senate in North Dakota, questioned whether the allegation of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be disqualifying for his Supreme Court nomination even if it were true.

In an interview with a local TV station, Cramer said if Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her three decades ago were true, it would be "unfortunate" and "terrible," but should be weighed against his life and judicial record since that time.

"Even if it's all true, does it disqualify him? It certainly means that he did something really bad 36 years ago, but does it disqualify him from the Supreme Court?" Cramer asked.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/25/cramer-questions-kavanaugh-assault-allegation-839970
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,021


« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2018, 01:09:37 PM »

This is the second time Cramer has dismissed the allegations against Kavanaugh, and this time he added that it wouldn't be disqualifying "even if" they were true.


At this point, I wouldn't even consider this a gaffe anymore.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.