Why have hot-button issues mainly been social, not economic? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 09:17:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why have hot-button issues mainly been social, not economic? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why have hot-button issues mainly been social, not economic?  (Read 1754 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: April 13, 2005, 07:46:29 PM »

The biggest hot button issues are abortion and gay marriage.

Why are social issues more likely to push hot buttons than economic ones?  Just about any given economic issue (like taxes, the deficit, business regulations, labor issues, etc.) will have a bigger impact on more people on a day-to-day basis.

The Republicans get to set the agenda and they choose winning issues for themselves.  It's that simple.

Some economic issues are winning issues.

For example, if the Democrats filibuster this death tax bill, the GOP will be wise to make it an issue in the 2006 congressional elections.

Also, Reagan ran almost entirely on economic issues. This was the first "social issues" campaign in a while.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2005, 07:59:32 PM »

I think most people hate the estate tax, but I could be wrong. They're thinking about repealing about 99% of it as a compromise, but that sounds really lame. Why can't taxes ever die? Just get rid of the whole thing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.