Bysh's 50 state approval ratings from SUSA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:25:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Bysh's 50 state approval ratings from SUSA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bysh's 50 state approval ratings from SUSA  (Read 4539 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: June 28, 2005, 09:01:04 PM »

These are adults. Among likely voters, Fox and ABC have 48%.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2005, 09:09:46 PM »

http://pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

I said likely voters.

The only other one I see is Zogby, and he does it differently. It's Excellent/Good 44%, Fair/Poor 56%.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2005, 09:11:24 PM »

I think we need to have that election again. Tongue

Knowing what we know now, I wish we could have the 1976 election again. I did vote for Carter.

Asked today, I would probably give Bush a low ranking. Not on the war, but on his spending habits at home. I'd rather have an economic conservative than a social one. I may become a Libertarian. Must....not....venture....into....the....land....of....irrelevency.

What qualifies as spending at home? A good portion of that is homeland security.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2005, 09:16:18 PM »

What's your point? I said 48% approval. If anything, that would have implied 52% disapproval.

In the last budget year of the Clinton administration (2001), discretionary spending unrelated to defense or homeland security soared by 15 percent. With the adoption of President Bush's first budget (2002), that growth rate was reduced to six percent; then five percent the following year; and four percent in 2004.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2005, 09:25:31 PM »

Hooked on Phonics, jfern?

Discretionary spending unrelated to defense or homeland security
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2005, 09:34:56 PM »

It used to fall under defense, and probably still should.

That's not cherrypicking. That's fundamental.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2005, 09:59:10 PM »

It used to fall under defense, and probably still should.

That's not cherrypicking. That's fundamental.

Disecretionary spending is up 45% under Bush
Medicare/ Medicaid are way up thanks to health care spiraling out of control, when most 1st world countries have a much better and cheaper single payer health care
Social Security is actually the most fiscally sound part of the whole federal government

Yes, and the growth of non-defense, non- homeland security discretionary spending has declined.

Canadian health care sucks; not that this has anything to do with anything. Certainly not anything to do with Bush.

Social Security is sound, yes, in the sense that everyone from my generation gets an automatic 30% benefit cut, but it'll pay the rest.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2005, 10:02:06 PM »

It's 48% job approval among likely voters, at a time of Social Security doubts, Iraq violence, and high gas prices. And in two years, at least two of those will probably be over. Certainly in four.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2005, 10:15:15 PM »

Everything you've posted has been addressed, hundreds of times if not thousands. Posting "you lose" after repeating something really dumb for the thousandth time and ignoring what the other person said doesn't help your argument.

Come back when you aren't a total idiot.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2005, 10:19:04 PM »

Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2005, 08:14:20 AM »

Personally, I think you probably know quite a lot about crack.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2005, 12:18:11 PM »

Bush is doing a great job, as are most Republicans in Congress, the RINOs being notable exceptions.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2005, 12:31:59 PM »

Well, the problem is that incumbents tend to have high ratings, and the Congress as a whole low ratings, especially when people are stressed about something. In this case, Iraq.

Obviously the answer is to instead try to frame the debate on domestic issues.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2005, 12:44:25 PM »

The 2003 tax cut was better.

Anyway, he should push to make his tax cuts permanent. Then focus on tax reform when his panel makes it recommendations this fall.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2005, 02:04:20 PM »

The tax panel is working off the assumption that Bush's tax cuts will be made permanent for its goal of revenue neutrality, so no, they will be made permanent, either now or as part of the tax reform act.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #15 on: June 29, 2005, 05:18:50 PM »

Adults or LV?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.