Clinton VP news LATEST: Podesta now calling the losers to tell them its not them (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 06:42:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton VP news LATEST: Podesta now calling the losers to tell them its not them (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton VP news LATEST: Podesta now calling the losers to tell them its not them  (Read 184287 times)
Hermit For Peace
hermit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,918


« on: June 21, 2016, 02:31:02 PM »

Looks like the Clinton VP short list might just be Castro, Kaine, and Warren, plus a couple of mystery choices, with speculation that some subset of Becerra, Brown, and Perez may be among the mystery choices.  And Clinton herself has already spent “hours” studying the records of the short listers:

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/21/politics/hillary-clinton-vice-president-search/index.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


I seriously doubt it will be Warren. She and Hillary do not have a good personal relationship, and that is one of the things Hillary is looking for in her VP choice. Two strong females working together is not a good idea anyway.

I don't know all the other choices except I've been researching Booker ever since I enjoyed watching him speak in that 15-hr marathon filibuster the other day. I like him and I like what he stands for. I'd like to see him as VP because he brings a dynamism to the position, he's real smart, and Hillary enjoyed campaigning with him, which is a good sign.

Gotta admit, though, I need more education on all the other possible choices.
Logged
Hermit For Peace
hermit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,918


« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2016, 10:22:01 PM »



*snip* Two strong females working together is not a good idea anyway. *snip*

And why would that be?

It's just something that happens. Women know about it. If you want more articulation, here's a pretty good short article that explains it better than me.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2572235/Women-HATE-office-Females-operate-better-male-bosses-study-finds.html

 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.