A 49% plurality, but fair enough. Unless he either does something absolutely awful.
He just did.
No, he did something good.
Pictured: the libertarian principle of "non-aggression".
www.saveservices.org/downloads/SAVE-Assault-Civil-Rights
He voted against a bad bill. Props to him.
It'd be nice if the proponents of the legislation actually knew what it did.
I stopped reading after this part:
"Section 102 of the Violence Against Women Act, Grants to Encourage Arrest and Enforce Restraining Orders, provides funds to state-level law enforcement, judges, and prosecutors to recommend, issue, and enforce restraining orders.
"Restraining orders bar couples from associating together, and thus prevent them from marrying or continuing a marriage. This represents an infringement on citizens' fundamental right to privacy."
The author clearly has no idea what domestic violence is, so I think we should all be taking his opinions with a massive heap of salt.
My God, that's hilarious.
