MA: Amendment to The Common Courtesy While Driving Act (Statute) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 08:42:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Amendment to The Common Courtesy While Driving Act (Statute) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Amendment to The Common Courtesy While Driving Act (Statute)  (Read 1460 times)
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« on: October 22, 2012, 11:54:34 AM »
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2012, 12:56:13 PM »
Proposed Amendment:

Section 2 of the Amendment to The Common Courtesy While Driving Act shall be amended to read as follows:

2. "Excessive noise or havoc" shall be defined as excessively intimidating drivers, and/or using profane language that is audible to other motorists."
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2012, 04:40:44 PM »
Aye
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2012, 03:30:34 PM »
Nay
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2012, 05:13:56 PM »
I'm not a fan of this amendment.  There needs to be a warning system.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2012, 02:06:50 PM »
« Edited: November 03, 2012, 02:08:24 PM by Mideast Assemblyman Mr. X »
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 02, 2012, 12:41:28 AM
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman Mr. X on October 30, 2012, 05:13:56 PM
I'm not a fan of this amendment.  There needs to be a warning system.

There's no warning for most other traffic violations.  Why this one?

Because it involves people having to pay a $250 fine if they are determined to have honked their car horn excessively.  That leaves a lot up to the officer's discretion.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2012, 02:14:02 PM »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on November 03, 2012, 02:09:09 PM
Quote from: Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 02, 2012, 12:41:28 AM
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman Mr. X on October 30, 2012, 05:13:56 PM
I'm not a fan of this amendment.  There needs to be a warning system.

There's no warning for most other traffic violations.  Why this one?
I don't think this should even be a traffic violation to begin with, but I'm trying to find some sort of compromise on here. If people would feel more comfortable just outright repealing the bill, I'd be fine with that.

I'd be fine with a repeal at this point.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,663
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2012, 08:15:57 PM »
Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.