[No Longer] Calling Out TNF: Update - TNF Comes Through!

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

The title made me think you were challenging him to a duel...

Which you probably think should be legal

Under F.L. 46-3 (the Atlasian Duels Act), "Should there be a mutual agreement, any two Atlasians may engage in a duel."

Did everyone forget about this?

And yeah, I was thinking about that awfully-long survey last night that I took awhile back but had yet to see the results.

If only Teddy knew about it

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Senator how do you defend Xahar while condemning Napoleon?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

One tiny, obscure tidbit from a giant piece of legislation is hardly an example of significant disconnect between the Federalist Party and the People. I'd rather be in our position than yours, because the country basically just rejected your entire worldview.

That's a novel interpretation of these results, to say the least, and an extraordinary amount of weight to place on an Atlasian poll in any case. What happens in the Senate is far more important. Wake me up when your party begins to get substantive bills passed.

What I take from that is basically that TNF is the entire Labor Party (which I don't reject; it's a convenient interpretation for us, too). The thing is, his legislative victories don't reflect a systematic or institutional "win" for the Labor establishment; y'all just lucked out with an extremely productive member.

Actually, Tyrion has a decent couple of bills in the queue right now, too. (And, while they're not members of my party, so do Lumine and Shua).

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I've never been a fan of meme-based legislation, as you know. Stuff like this is an embarrassing and uninteresting waste of time.

Department renaming, though? I don't think it's trival. It'd be nice to allow Cabinet officials to call themselves something a bit less sterile than "Secretary of Internal/External Affairs."

  The point of this game is, first and foremost, to have fun.  If we can't introduce deliberately ridiculous bills every once in a while, then there's really no point.  The biggest problem in Atlasia has nothing to do with activity or ideology, it is that many people in all parties take it too seriously (honestly, I'm guilty of this myself sometimes).  There are literally no stakes to any of this and I see nothing wrong with introducing some bills that don't accomplish some critical policy objective as long as it is balanced with serious and productive proposals.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

So if we were playing Risk and I scribbled all over the board with crayon, would that make the game more "fun"?

This is the second disagreement we've had where you've resorted to trying to using a straw-man.  I hope this isn't a sign of things to come, because I really do think you can do better than that.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

So if we were playing Risk and I scribbled all over the board with crayon, would that make the game more "fun"?

This is the second disagreement we've had where you've resorted to trying to using a straw-man.  I hope this isn't a sign of things to come, because I really do think you can do better than that.

Please clarify what makes these situations different.

Your risk scenario can only be described as a blatant act of d*****bagery, likely intended to ruin the game for others, that renders the game unplayable.  I don't think any reasonable person could honestly describe introducing two joke bills out of one's entire time in the Senate as a malevolent attempt to ruin Atlasia for everyone else out of sheer dickishness (though someone probably will just to try to troll me).  I'm sorry if you don't approve of introducing the occasional joke bill, but I won't apologize for occasionally introducing one.  If you really take such great offense to the cowbell bill and the stingray bill, you really need to CTFO.  Oh and by the way, you might also want to take a look at your own actions.  I don't recall you being nearly as upset about NM-AM, the Cultural-Marxists, or any other novelty party.  My apologies if I'm misremembering, but if not, then you really don't have a leg to stand on as far as criticizing me for those two bills goes.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I'm sorry if you don't approve of introducing the occasional joke bill, but I won't apologize for occasionally introducing one.  If you really take such great offense to the cowbell bill and the stingray bill, you really need to CTFO.

I'm the one who's taking this too seriously? Heh...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I didn't say that I was "upset" about your bill, I said that it was uninteresting and a waste of time. Feel free to prove me wrong.

Yes, you are the one taking this too seriously.  As for the second part of your post, your claim that the bill was an embarrassing waste of time is entirely subjective.  I can no more prove you wrong than you can prove yourself right.  And even if such were possible, the burden of proof would fall on you since you're the one who made the claim.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

I'm sorry if you don't approve of introducing the occasional joke bill, but I won't apologize for occasionally introducing one.  If you really take such great offense to the cowbell bill and the stingray bill, you really need to CTFO.

I'm the one who's taking this too seriously? Heh...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I didn't say that I was "upset" about your bill, I said that it was uninteresting and a waste of time. Feel free to prove me wrong.

Yes, you are the one taking this too seriously.  As for the second part of your post, your claim that the bill was an embarrassing waste of time is entirely subjective.  I can no more prove you wrong than you can prove yourself right.  And even if such were possible, the burden of proof would fall on you since you're the one who made the claim.

Feel free to prove me wrong by making debate on your law fun and entertaining. I don't expect you to construct a literal logical proof showing me how Premise A along with Premises B, C, and D necessarily lead to F-U-N.

Ah, sorry I misunderstood.  I certainly intend to do my best

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

It's good to see some debate on those proposals (I opposed a good number of them, so the results were fine with me with small exceptions like animal rights), but if this is going to turn into the same old tired fight over which is the most awesome party and who is or isn't opportunistic or a moderate hero I highly recommend a few duels (I think Griffin has a good establishment for those affairs) to solve this and stop repeating the same arguments over and over again.

Is that legitimately a thing that people abide by (half-joking)?

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Duels are entirely legal. I look forward to the legendary X-Nix Duel Sponsored By Ex-Lax And Alfred's Bandages Corporation.

I wouldn't duel Nix, I still think he is a pretty good guy who means well and is generally a pretty reasonable guy (though we've been going at it quite a bit today).  I'd hope he'd say the same of me, but if not, it won't change my view of him.  Plus, he was a fellow member of TPP in its first run.  If I challenged anyone it'd be Napoleon

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Napoleon has besmirched my honor one too many times!  Fortunately, we live in a time when you can challenge a man to a duel!  I challenge him to Fk ‘n’ Luck.  If I am struck down, I only ask that my good friend Senator TNF posthumously publish my environmental article.  Loser deregisters for two months.  Good day, sir

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

FTR, the right honorable Dereich of Florida will be my second.  Hopefully, Napoleon has the courage to answer my challenge.