Some of the Rand Paul-Hillary Clinton debates would actually be interesting. Too bad they're never going to happen.
It'd be interesting to see the response of partisans whose views on the Iraq War were closer to the original ones of the opposing party's nominee, but I agree it's unlikely we'll ever see it happen. But I do think we are fairly likely to see Hillary debating a Democrat like Sanders or Schweitzer advocating a foreign policy that's lighter on intervention. But that debate would probably be much more muddled than what people here imagine it to be; I don't think even the non-interventionist would be adamantly opposed to airstrikes against ISIS and even Hillary would say the Iraq War was a mistake.
Rand would easily win a foreign policy debate with Hillary (she has a terrible foreign policy record, tbh). However, she'd win the election against him even more easily
