DisruptJ20

[EnglishPete]

First part of what looks like a very interesting James O'Keefe report on the #disruptJ20 anti-Trump inaugural protests. Just as left wing thugs were previously exposed by O'Keefe as being behind violence around Trump rallies it looks like the same sort are planning the same sort of thing for the inauguration

James O'Keefe
‏@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: Undercover video exposes groups plotting criminal activity and violence at @realDonaldTrump inauguration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZSfhd1X_8

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

[EnglishPete]

O'Keefe on Sean Hannity radio show now

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

[EnglishPete]

Looks like the criminal leftist element are going to be on their guard

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/821112040899092485

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong.

You mean like people who are convinced that CNN and The Washington Post are reliable and trustworthy news sources?

[EnglishPete]

F.A.K.E.  N.E.W.S. 

Suck it

I think you're someone else who is confusing Project Veritas with the Washington Post

[EnglishPete]

Fake news. 

You're getting Project Veritas muddled up with CNN and the Washington Post there.

Haha.

But seriously, stop being cancerous.

There's literally nothing you can do or say to convince him his sources and beliefs could be wrong.

You mean like people who are convinced that CNN and The Washington Post are reliable and trustworthy news sources?

Oh yes, the fact that the two sources you mentioned are generally considered reputable and are staffed by professionals within their field makes them less trustworthy than some guy spouting nonsensical conspiracy theories via his twitter. Again, I understand that you reject the very basis of those sources, since you consider their professional credentials suspect at best and any alignment with the establishment immediate grounds for being discredited. As I said, you're a conspiracy theorist who rejects universities, reputable news agencies, and so on as agents of left-wing propaganda, whose discoveries and discourse is heavily skewed by an inherent or learned bias; therefore, the only trustworthy sources are free agents who report via online social media outlets.

I don't agree with that. Free agents who report via online social media outlets aren't trustworthy at all. In every case whether its the Washington Post or Project Veritas or just some guy on twitter a report has to be judged on the evidence provided to back up its claims examined in the light of reason. Conspiracy theories are ten a penny and most of them are rubbish or just plain disinfo. The report by Project Veritas isn't a 'conspiracy theory' its an undercover report showing some people planning a crime on video.

[EnglishPete]

Nobody in their right mind takes O'Keefe seriously.

Again I think you're confusing O'Keefe with the Washington Post.

[EnglishPete]

Some interesting tweets here

https://twitter.com/midnightride20

[EnglishPete]

I see the lefties have thought up some imaginative and original chants for the demo

[EnglishPete]

Part 2 of the O'Keefe series now available



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIjbkYLI1nY

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2017-01-17/anti-trump-disruptj20-activists-scale-back-inauguration-blockade-plans

[EnglishPete]

Tweet from Deploraball

MAGA3X
‏@MAGA3X
Several #DisruptJ20 protesters purchased tickets to the Deploraball. We refunded their tickets. Here is the message we included.



https://twitter.com/MAGA3X/status/821467859763265543

[EnglishPete]

^ On a list of things that will definitely happen, that one is super up there.

For the record, O'Keefe deliberately distorts, alters, and edits his films to falsely incriminate people. He is a malicious liar, and an unskilled one at that. If you're either dumb enough or so desperate to have your beliefs validated to give him the attention he wants, I'm sorry for you m9.

Lots of people getting mixing up James O'Keefe and the Washington Post

[EnglishPete]

^ On a list of things that will definitely happen, that one is super up there.

For the record, O'Keefe deliberately distorts, alters, and edits his films to falsely incriminate people. He is a malicious liar, and an unskilled one at that. If you're either dumb enough or so desperate to have your beliefs validated to give him the attention he wants, I'm sorry for you m9.

Lots of people getting mixing up James O'Keefe and the Washington Post

Ridiculous

[EnglishPete]

^ On a list of things that will definitely happen, that one is super up there.

For the record, O'Keefe deliberately distorts, alters, and edits his films to falsely incriminate people. He is a malicious liar, and an unskilled one at that. If you're either dumb enough or so desperate to have your beliefs validated to give him the attention he wants, I'm sorry for you m9.

Lots of people getting mixing up James O'Keefe and the Washington Post

Lol I. And that line got old pretty fast

True though isn't it.

[EnglishPete]

Tweet from O'Keefe

James O'Keefe
‏@JamesOKeefeIII
A victory today. #DisruptJ20 has scaled back their operations. #veritasgetsresults
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/17/expose-anarchist-group-scales-back-plans-blocked-roads-disrupt-inauguration/



https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/821767187157450753

[EnglishPete]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/821769988310712320

[EnglishPete]

^ On a list of things that will definitely happen, that one is super up there.

For the record, O'Keefe deliberately distorts, alters, and edits his films to falsely incriminate people. He is a malicious liar, and an unskilled one at that. If you're either dumb enough or so desperate to have your beliefs validated to give him the attention he wants, I'm sorry for you m9.

Lots of people getting mixing up James O'Keefe and the Washington Post

Lol I. And that line got old pretty fast

True though isn't it.

:|No

LOL
You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

[EnglishPete]

muh soros conspiracy

Well funny you should mention that

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/18/professional-activists-behind-chaos-plot-trump-inauguration/

[EnglishPete]

^ On a list of things that will definitely happen, that one is super up there.

For the record, O'Keefe deliberately distorts, alters, and edits his films to falsely incriminate people. He is a malicious liar, and an unskilled one at that. If you're either dumb enough or so desperate to have your beliefs validated to give him the attention he wants, I'm sorry for you m9.

Lots of people getting mixing up James O'Keefe and the Washington Post

Lol I. And that line got old pretty fast

True though isn't it.

:|No

LOL
You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.

There's a difference between getting a prediction wrong (what much of the mainstream news did in underestimating Trump/thinking Hillary was going to win) and deliberately distorting/misreporting what has already happened and trying to pass that off as news.

Simple guide:

News reporter on 9/10/01: "I think tomorrow will be a fairly typical day." -> Incorrect prediction, but not fake news

News reporter on 9/12/01: "What happened yesterday was an elaborate publicity stunt by Insane Clown Posse." -> Fake News

The Washington Post has done the latter repeatedly during this election and transition period. Lets give one example where they were particularly closely involved. I've mentioned this particular case before but I'll mention it again. You'll remember the Michelle Fields assault hoax (the most recent one that is, Fields is a repeat offender when it comes to hoaxing assaults on herself). Fields, then working for Breitbart (happily they were rid of this con artist shortly afterwards) was at a Donald Trump press conference in Florida. According to her account she was asking a question of Trump when she was subject to a vicious and unprovoked assault by Trump's then campaign manager Cory Lewendowski.

Now hotel security footage released by Trump after being shared with police revealed clearly that her account of events was bunk and charges against Lewendowski were dropped. Now before this footage was released one Youtuber did some investigation of the case and in particular the role of Washington Post journalists Ben Terris and Jabin Botsford in perpetuating a hoax

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B6K7iiV_zk

I would recommend that people have a look at the evidence presented in the above video and then think about the fact that the Washington Post maintain to this day that their original account was accurate. Then draw your own conclusions.

[EnglishPete]

Hopefully this is true.

This replies above are much more refreshingly honest. I don't agree with those who approve of domestic terrorism but it shows an unusual honesty to admit such approval.

The Acorn guy? yeah...

I'm a little surprised here at Alex. A socialist from Greece. His country is famous for its hardcore AntiFa terrorists. And yet here he is trying to hide AntiFa's light under a bushel.