who has done more harm to the cause they support?

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Environmentalists against nuclear energy, though it's not as bad as people suggest, but generally using more nuclear energy as a transition to green energy would've been better than relying on fossil fuels and gas for longer, because even today we still have issues with that. And nuclear reactors take time to build also, so it's like harder to invest in that today.

But it's not as b/w as some make it seem to be like.

Pro-Palestinians being harmful to their cause is just propaganda from pro-Israeli people or ppl who condone genocide, and personal bias and opinion is involved in that claim, so i disagree with that though. If you believe they've harmed the cause, reception would've never been great to start with. And the world is waking up so it clearly is helping a lot.

Even some of the forum... seem to have shifted their opinion a little bit compared to 6 months ago when i was the boogeyman. Hopefully, one day you'll realize i was right but i don't want to see revisionism like with Iraq claiming that the majority of the forum never supported Iraq in the first place.

Pretty sure ppl would have been more vocal if Trump was the president and did the exact same things as Biden now.