MN Sen Recount (UPDATE: Stuart Smalley certified winner, lawsuit forthcoming)

[Bacon King]

My opinion on those challenges:

1. Reject. The law is kind of silly but unless it gets overturned this shouldn't count.
2. Franken. Pencil argument is kind of silly.
3. Depends. Looks to me like someone made an X and then realized they had to fill in the circle. If they made the same mistake on the presidential box above it's clearly a vote for Coleman but otherwise it should count for no one.
4. Coleman.

1. Franken
2. Honestly depends on how specific the law is, but should count for Coleman I think.
3. Reject it.
4. Franken
5. Franken
6. Franken
7. Coleman
8. Franken
9. Barkley
10. Barkley
11. Impossible to determine whether it's a line to cross out or an underline to show the correct choice. Reject it.

[Bacon King]

Now why in the world would you join the New York Republican Party on account some specific dude happened to have won a majority of the Minnesota DFL's Senate Primary and then is subsequently elected by the Minnesota electorate?

[Bacon King]

Now why in the world would you join the New York Republican Party on account some specific dude happened to have won a majority of the Minnesota DFL's Senate Primary and then is subsequently elected by the Minnesota electorate?

Because Sam is being the attention whore he usually is and wants us to waste a thread or two massaging his ego.

Do whatever you wish.

Note , by the way, that my own comment was not intended in any negative light, just complete curiousity. I'm seriously interested in your reasoning here.

[Bacon King]

lol, so much for the people b!tching about how the election was going to be stolen by Franken.