Outside of real estate (where most of my assets lie - maybe 75% of the total), about 60% in high quality short duration bonds, 40% in equities. Of the equities, 60% US, 40% ex-US, with about
5 to 6 times the normal market exposure to small cap companies (45% in small caps as compared to 8% for normal market exposure), and close to a third more than the normal market weighting in favor of value companies over growth companies, two thirds value to one third growth, rather than half and half (hi Eugene Fama, how are you doing?
). The theme here is to get risky with the equity side (as well as harvest that mysterious higher return for value), and get really safe with the bond side (including having a fair chunk in US treasuries, which are the one thing that does not get illiquid when Lehman type omega shocks hit the market).
Everything except for US treasuries, is in mutual funds, most with Vanguard (the place where expense ratios for me range from 5 basis points (1/20 of 1%), to about 25 basis points). I rarely trade or sell anything, othen than in extreme conditions (buy when equities are really low (big expected equity premium), sell when really high (low to none to negative expected equity premia (it was negative around 2000 with the IT bubble)), to change my equity exposure up or down some (not by more than 10% though). Some mutual funds I have held for near 20 years. Most everything not in the IRA, is also in highly tax efficient funds (index or tax managed funds), the exception being a small cap and a value foreign stock mutual fund, which are outside the IRA in order to harvest the foreign tax credits, which are lost in a tax deferred account. I don't like paying capital gains taxes.
Vanguard tells me that my return for the last year overall has been 15.13%, having just looked it up. Sometimes I don't look that up for over a year or more.
I think that about sums it up.
Oh, a young person, with lots of expected human capital (has a secure high paying job that can be expected to continue), should be 100% in equities when, like now, market conditions, and the expected equity premia, are reasonably normal. A case can be made for such a person to go over 100%, buying on margin (negative bond exposure as it were), but I digress. For most people however, they should be at least 20% in bonds, until such time, if ever, as they are saving for their heirs, rather than themselves. That is my opinion anyway.