Where will Trump do better in New York?

[Torie]

Incidentally, I think "New Yorkshire" or "New Netherland" are better terms for "upstate New York", as New Amsterdam refers to the settlement which grew into New York City and not the Dutch colony. I prefer New Yorkshire, as the topography of "upstate New York" resembles Yorkshire far more than it does the Netherlands, let alone York or Amsterdam.

Albany is the oldest Dutch settlement in NY, founded in 1614. NYC was not founded until 1625.

[Torie]

Hudsonians feeling festive at "Berning Man, the Revolution Comes to Hudson."  One of my buddies can be seen pounding the drums.



Clinton is going to carry "heavy" that county in the far NE? The Birkenstock Belt intrudes into that county.

[Torie]

New poll says Trump crushes in the NYC burbs, is ahead by about 15 points in NYC (52% for Trump I recall), and it is considerably closer upstate. So now we sort of know. It's good to know that Trump will be wasting a lot of votes on the NYC burbs. He just crushes in Nassau and Suffolk counties, with more than 60% of the vote. So Kasich is really in the hunt for some delegates in NYC (Cruz is next to nothing in NYC and the NYC burbs), and both Cruz and/or Kasich upstate might pick off maybe 6-7 delegates or something like that. So my best guess is that Trump will get maybe 85 delegates. If "we" get lucky, it could fall below 80.