Sherrod Brown, Julian Castro, Kristen Gillibrand

[SCNCmod]

In one of the polls I posted recently on here regarding 2020 candidates, the 3 candidates that seemed to be the least divisive between the various factions of the Dems... were:

Sherrod Brown, Julian Castro, Kirsten Gillibrand.

These 3 have a wide mix of demographics, experience, political skills, etc.  So my question is- In each of the pairing, who is best as President & as VP (based on gut feeling, balance, campaign style, experience, or anything else that comes to your mind)..

I will just list the two names in Alphabetical order... you respond by listing the pairings as (Pres)/(VP).

1) Brown & Castro

2) Casto & Gillibrand

3) Brown & Gillibrand

[SCNCmod]

Castro is a little boy with no quality, he is never going to be the President.

Gillibrand is an average candidate as of now & surely nowhere near ready for 2020. Maybe in 2024 she will be ready but she has to develop big league.

Brown from Ohio as a progressive does have a chance in the future but I am not sure if he has the charisma and he is facing a tough election in 2018.

I don't think any of these people can win the primary, being considered least evil doesn't count for anything, you have to win stuff which is why Booker is the best establishment candidate !

I like booker also... but I wonder how divisive he will be in a primary... he has some rehabilitation to do (which he started this morning on CNN).

Regarding Pairing, I think the strongest would be:
1. Castro/ Brown
2. Brown/ Castro
3. Castro/ Gillibrand
4. Gillibrand/ Castro