How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 12:05:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did Dukakis do fairly well in Louisiana but very badly in New Hampshire?  (Read 1953 times)
F. Joe Haydn
HenryWallaceVP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,248


« on: April 15, 2018, 01:10:54 PM »

Dukakis lost Louisiana by 10%, which, for a Democrat, is quite good. It was his best Southern state in the election, and he did much better there than Kerry, Obama, and Hillary (but not Bill) Clinton. It seems odd, though, that Dukakis would perform so well there, especially given his "Massachusetts Liberal" reputation during the election. Also, New Hampshire was the second most Republican state in the election, as Bush won over 60% of the vote there. Although New Hampshire was definitely Republican leaning at the time, Bush winning the state by over 60% seems odd, especially when considering that Dukakis was a New Englander.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.