UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 04:05:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018  (Read 10616 times)
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,027


« on: September 15, 2018, 09:36:48 AM »
« edited: September 15, 2018, 09:41:56 AM by Oryxslayer »

Don't use the island consituencies as examples. Even though they are both extremes: Wight too large, Hebrides too small, islands are clear communities of interest. Cutting them both makes the map more messy and abuses water continuity. Hawaiian state districts don't hop islands for example, even though the US has 1 man, 1 vote.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,027


« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2021, 07:48:37 AM »



Supposedly leaded boundaries of the new Welsh constituencies. We all know from personal experience that drawing these lines sensibly would be a challenger, and even though the lines appear orderly, you still have to have things like B&R now getting a good chunk of former Neath.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.