What would be your strategy to get to 218 if you're the dccc? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 02:39:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  What would be your strategy to get to 218 if you're the dccc? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Huh
#1
Appeal to sunbelters and suburbia by focusing on russia and trump
#2
Appeal to rustbelters and rural areas by focusing on healthcare and
#3
Appeal to both, but emphasize the rust belt
#4
Appeal to both, but emphasize the sunbelt
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: What would be your strategy to get to 218 if you're the dccc?  (Read 1850 times)
Cactus Jack
azcactus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,956
United States


« on: June 22, 2017, 02:07:07 PM »

I maintain that they should really hunker down in Arizona, but friendly districts in states like Kansas and Nebraska are most likely the way forward. James Thompson's near miss earlier this year should be made a model for future campaigns in similar districts.
Logged
Cactus Jack
azcactus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,956
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2017, 06:12:44 PM »

Localize the races. Local, local, local. Put Simon Roseburg, Pete Buttigieg, and James Carville in an executive committee to come up with strategies.

As for specific policies? Emphasize the Sun Belt, but don't turn it into a campaign about Russia and Trump. Poll what issues do well.

Yeah, pretty much this. Run on relevant district issues and let Trump's mouth-frothing stupidity speak for itself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.