...but isn't democracy fundamentally all about the right of people to put in a government of demagogues?
Yes of course, and thus, I prefer other certain other systems over democracy.
If the Democrats want to retake power in Thailand, the answer is obvious: get out there in the rice paddies and steal Thai Rak Thai and its successors' electioneering tactics rather than sneering at them from Bangkok and overthrowing the government every two years.
No, the point is they want good governance- not the populist train wreck that would be required to be elected democratically. So, the way they have been doing it is better in context - so far. I don't deny that the downward spiral into mass rule seems to be in the cards - after all every other ancien régime has fallen - but
not yet. In Thailand, not yet.
1. People elect Thaksinites, they horrify the establishment with their complete lack of knowledge about...well...anything
2. Military overthrows civilian government
3. Military allows civilian government back under the condition they don't elect Thaksinites.
4. People elect Thaksinites.
We can only hope! I mean that the step 2 can continue to be repeated (subsequent elimination of step 3 is apparently too much to hope for) forever. Alas, that which saves us here is hundreds of years old, and I fear, will one day soon succumb as well- it is like trying to hold back dynamite with a lace curtain.