foreign 'leaders' that should be dealt with (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 12:19:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  foreign 'leaders' that should be dealt with (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: foreign 'leaders' that should be dealt with  (Read 1825 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: April 03, 2005, 02:59:17 PM »

hopefully, we can someday overturn that silly executive order that bans executions of foreign leaders.  im strongly against the death penalty, but i do support executions of despots that clearly threaten regional and/or world security.

here is the list of leaders that need to be dealt with first:

assad
castro
chavez
mugabe
the little demigod of north korea


Why do you interest yourself in those people, Mitty?  What do they have to do with the US?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2005, 03:18:48 PM »

Why do you interest yourself in those people, Mitty?  What do they have to do with the US?

NixonNow-Prick who supports the Iraqi insurgents and oppreses Lebanese

You mean he supports the brave men who are resisting the American invasion of their country?  And protects Lebanese against Isreali agression?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, he oppressed the owning class - they all had to flee to Florida. (Lesson - institute redistributive Keynesian Capitalism before you get run out of the country)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  Which terrorists?  Maybe you're thinking of Musharraf or the Saudis.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Who cares if someone is getting oppressed in some other country?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sounds like GW.  Besides, if Iraq had had nuclear weapons they would still be an independent country - lesson learned eh?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2005, 03:46:32 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  Which terrorists?  Maybe you're thinking of Musharraf or the Saudis.

Chavez plans to meet with Iranian leaders and his associates have been linked to arms sales to the Taliban and Columbian drug lords.

Well, you know how I feel about drug lords.  As for the Iranians, they're no more 'terrorists' than the US troops in Iraq.  They're just our 'enemies'.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2005, 12:14:38 PM »

The iraqui resistance is not an entire group, and plus many resistences around the world, including the french resistance in wwII attacked colaborationists.

Random bombs placed that kill innocents who aren't fighting to make their country better are what these "insurgents" are using. As a guerilla force, the police, guard, and American forces are legitimate targets, not civilians.

You're applying a double standard - the American invaders cause all sorts of 'collateral damage' as well.

Besides some of those 'civilians' are in fact collaberators.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 8 queries.