If you could change 4 Supreme Court cases what would you change (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:02:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  If you could change 4 Supreme Court cases what would you change (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If you could change 4 Supreme Court cases what would you change  (Read 29791 times)
IndustrialJustice
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 552


« on: January 14, 2018, 01:50:30 PM »

Most of the Supreme Court's labor law jurisprudence is reactionary nonsense, but the following three cases are especially odious for narrowing the National Labor Relations Board's remedial authority under Section 10(c) of the NLRA, and, more importantly, effectively castrating labor's nascent right to strike:

NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938).

NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Co., 306 U.S. 240 (1939).

NLRB v. Sands Manufacturing Co., 306 U.S. 332 (1939).

The Court's pending Janus decision will be my fourth, but in the meantime I'd throw in Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, 398 U.S. 235 (1970), which gutted the Norris–La Guardia Act's anti-injunction mechanism.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.