Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:54:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win)  (Read 5070 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,838
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17
« on: April 21, 2012, 05:12:22 PM »
2008 was Romney's yr and they instead nominated Sarah Palin as VP or John McCain as the prez. Mitt Romney should have been the VP nominee or the prez nominee because the Great Recession had a more profound effect in 2008 than now and the economy is his strong suit. Now, that the economy is recovering it is recovering fast enough for Obama to be reelected.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.