Democrats Face a Grim Future -National Journal (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:48:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Democrats Face a Grim Future -National Journal (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats Face a Grim Future -National Journal  (Read 3034 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,591
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« on: May 24, 2015, 12:55:47 PM »

It won't get better for Dems if Hillary wins in 2016...

I dont think Dems will be sad that they beat the GOP again, if Dems win presidency and Senate.

Dems are worried about 2016,  first, than some trens that the GOP is dominant in House and state and local govt.

Tester, McCaskill and Manchin have won 1 election before and Sherrod Brown. They arent freshmen like Hagen or Begich.

But Donnelly and Heikamp are new.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,591
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2015, 03:07:41 PM »

GOP will not win a veto proof majority in 2018.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,591
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2015, 04:30:03 PM »

A GOP win 2016 is feesable; but not inevitable. The tea party is split with the establishment, GOP.  And Latinos are the third constituency of the Democratic party.


Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,591
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2015, 06:15:18 PM »

I agree..the future looks bleak for the Dems...if the dems win the WH in 2016,I see a bloodbath in 2018

I think a Republican wins in 2016, but, if not, I could see the Republicans in the mid-60s in the Senate after the midterms (maybe a veto-proof majority?).

No. In general, the Administration's Party loses seats in the House and Senate in midterm elections. This is especially so if the economy is in a tailspin or if America is enmeshed in an unpopular war.

Veto-proof majority in the Senate? That would probably give the Republicans a similar majority in the House, too, and thus the ability to change the Constitution practically at will. The Republican Party is becoming more authoritarian, so I can only imagine what sort of mischief would be possible.   

Joe Donnelly is the one to watch in 2018; McCaskill and Tester and Heikamp can hold on.

But, the GOP couldnt get its act together to ban flag burning; even when they had votes in House and pull Conrad and Dorgan along.

But; they might not want the supermajority because of term limits would be forced upon them to pass.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,591
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2015, 06:36:04 AM »

Why is the GOP keep talking about exposed senate seats; they have exposed governorships as well; where redistricting will take place in 2020. Keep WH; win govs in 2018; control redistricting hold our losses in 2018, and redistrict the 18 seats that were targetted in House in 2014;.and win those.

I rather be in WH than not for nxt four years.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.