Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 02:57:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: More bitter/tougher defeat?
#1
Al Gore
 
#2
Hillary Clinton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 122

Author Topic: Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016  (Read 4963 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: January 09, 2017, 01:40:50 PM »

Gore. 

Both were apparently taken aback.  Hillary certainly looked like she had been on a week-long bender when she re-emerged a week later from whatever cave she crawled into on election night, but at least her defeat was quick.  With Gore, it dragged on for six weeks.  We didn't know the winner of that election till December 12, after which Gore went into hiding, grew a beard, and holed up in his 10000-square-foot Belle Meade mansion with heated pool while he wrote about how we're warming up the globe by living large. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.