In ILP v DoFA, Sam's vote may well have been more egregiously campaigning in the thread, but the SoFA, Q, made ZERO defense of his decision, and told us basically, to interpret it.
I thought that making normative statements about any of the candidates constituted campaigning, and because it seemed so obvious to me, I decided to let the Court decide the definition of campaigning for itself. I'm not sure that the Court has yet defined what constitutes "campaigning" -- I hope that it will in this case.
