Do you support the missile strikes on Syria?

[Beet]

Some people don't understand that Al Qaeda and ISIS will never take over Syria for one reason: their ideology is unpopular. In fact, after decades of rising popularity of the hijab in the ME, some women are now throwing them off and burning them. On the other hand that maniac could be in power for decades, just like his father was after Hama.

[Beet]

Wow. Interesting that so many Dems are happy with Trump being "tough".

Well, well, well... I hope it will kill a Trump-Russia-Collaboration narrative and give a boost to Trump approval rating. Then Trump & Sessions can also be "tough" on domestic policies. Bloodthirsty Dems deserved it.

So TRUMP does something you don't like and you blame the opposition? Absurd. Besides, if the Dems opposed this you would be saying we were hypocritical for supporting a candidate who wanted the same thing, and only opposed it because he's Trump and he can't win with us no matter what he does yada yada. Can't win.

Anyway, this was a nothingburger just for show as the pre-attack warnings proved. It did virtually nothing.

[Beet]

I think I'm shifting on this issue again. What's done is done, but there should be no more intervention in Syria. What good can weakening Assad do, now? The sooner he crushes the rebels, the sooner the war is over. That is the humane option at this point... to let evil win. Sad, but it is what it is. Anyway, I don't want Trump starting to see war as the solution to his political problems. That's not the right path.